Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Les nominations de l’« affaire du foulard » dans la littérature en sciences humaines et sociales : enjeux socio-politiques de l’argumentation scientifique

Abstract : This article develops a discursive analysis of the naming process of the “Islamic scarf affair” through the literature of scientific journals in Social and Human Science (SHS). By means of a semiotic approach centered on the argumentative, rhetorical and sociopolitical dimensions of naming processes, this study examines socio-discursive and metalinguistic disputes related to possible namings and legitimated meanings of the public debate on the veil. By setting the scientific literature about the “Islamic scarf affair” at the center of our research, our analysis procedure consists in highlighting not only the namings studied by researchers, but also the argumentative dimension of their own analysis. We treat the arena of scientific reviews as a discursive space of polemical interactions in which SHS researchers propose, refute and negotiate the legitimate namings of this public debate.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-03003718
Contributor : Réunion Univ <>
Submitted on : Friday, November 13, 2020 - 12:56:02 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, December 10, 2020 - 8:14:02 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, February 14, 2021 - 6:51:06 PM

File

aad-2240.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Camila Arêas. Les nominations de l’« affaire du foulard » dans la littérature en sciences humaines et sociales : enjeux socio-politiques de l’argumentation scientifique. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, University of Tel-Aviv, 2016, ⟨10.4000/aad.2240⟩. ⟨hal-03003718⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

23

Files downloads

59