HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election?

Abstract : We compare the Condorcet Efficiencies of the plurality rule, the negative plurality rule, and the Borda rule to address the question of what might be gained by using a voting rule that requires candidate rankings. Unlike previous analyses, we consider only those voting situations for which the three rules determine different candidates as winners, because these are the cases where the Condorcet Efficiencies might actually differ across the three rules. After assessing the theoretical as well as the empirical Condorcet Efficiencies, we find that, despite considerable differences between the properties of the theoretical framework and the characteristics of three sets of empirical ranking data, all four analyses suggest that there is a considerable benefit in asking voters to submit candidate rankings.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01243409
Contributor : Réunion Univ Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - 7:36:58 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 5:56:06 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

William V. Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley, Florenz Plassmann. Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election?. Social Choice and Welfare, Springer Verlag, 2015, pp.1--41. ⟨10.1007/s00355-015-0920-5⟩. ⟨hal-01243409⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

81