W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243452

, Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes, 2017.

A. Gibbard, Manipulation of voting schemes : A general result, Econometrica, vol.41, issue.4, pp.587-601, 1973.

G. Guilbaud, Les théories de l'intérêt général et le problème logique de l'agrégation, vol.63, pp.659-720, 2012.

C. Hillinger, On the possibility of democracy and rational collective choice, 2004.

, The case for utilitarian voting, vol.11, pp.295-321, 2005.

L. N. Hoang, Strategy-proofness of the randomized Condorcet voting system, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.48, issue.3, pp.679-701, 2017.

H. C. Huang and V. C. Chua, Analytical representation of probabilities under the IAC condition, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.17, issue.1, pp.143-155, 2000.

O. Hudry, Votes et paradoxes : les élections ne sont pas monotones !, Mathématiques et sciences humaines, issue.163, 2003.

J. S. Kelly, Arrow impossibility theorems, 1978.

S. Konieczny, Une (courte) introduction à la théorie du choix social, 2008.

D. Lepelley, A. Louichi, and H. Smaoui, On Ehrhart polynomials and probabilit y calculations in voting theory, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.30, issue.3, pp.363-383, 2008.

K. O. May, A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision, Econometrica, vol.20, issue.4, pp.680-684, 1952.

R. G. Niemi and W. H. Riker, The choice of voting systems, Scientific American, vol.234, issue.6, pp.21-27, 1976.

H. Nurmi, Comparing Voting Systems. D.Reidel, 1987.

, Voting paradoxes and how to deal with them, 1999.

G. Pritchard and M. C. Wilson, Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.29, issue.3, pp.487-513, 2007.

D. Saari, Basic geometry of voting, 1995.

M. A. Satterthwaite, Strategy-proofness and arrow's conditions : Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.10, issue.2, p.22, 1975.

A. Sen, The impossibility of a paretian liberal, Journal of Political Economy, vol.78, issue.1, pp.152-157, 1970.

, La possibilité du choix social, vol.70, pp.7-61, 1999.

A. K. Sen, Social choice theory, Handbook of mathematical economics, vol.3, pp.1073-1181, 1986.

S. Verdoolaege, Library barvinok, ver. 0.34, 2011.

A. Barvinok, A polynomial time algorithm for counting integral points in polyhedra when the dimension is fixed, Mathematics of Operations Research, vol.19, pp.769-779, 1994.

S. Berg and D. Lepelley, On probability models in voting theory, Statistica Neerlandica, vol.48, pp.133-146, 1992.

F. Brandt, C. Geist, and M. Strobel, Analyzing the practical relevance of voting paradoxes via Ehrhart theory, computer simulations and empirical data, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2016.

F. Brandt, J. Hofbauer, and M. Strobel, Exploring the no-show paradox for Condorcet extensions using Ehrhart theory and computer simulations, Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, Essays by and in honor of William Gehrlein and Dominique Lepelley, Diss, M. and Merlin, 2020.

W. Bruns and B. Ichim, Polytope volumes by descent in the face lattice and applications in social choice, 2018.

W. Bruns, B. Ichim, and C. Söger, Computations of volumes and Ehrhart series in four candidate elections, Annals of Operations Research, pp.5-7, 2019.

W. Bruns and C. Söger, The computation of generalized Ehrhart series in Normaliz, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol.68, pp.75-86, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01022882

D. Bubboloni, M. Diss, and M. Gori, Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to committee selection setting, forthcoming in Public Choice, 2018.

D. Cervone, W. V. Gehrlein, and W. Zwicker, Which scoring rule maximizes Condorcet efficiency under IAC?, Theory & Decision, vol.58, pp.145-185, 2005.

P. Clauss, Counting solutions to linear and nonlinear constraints through Ehrhart polynomials: Applications to analyze and transform scientific programs, International Conference on Supercomputing, pp.278-285, 1996.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01100296

P. Clauss and V. Loechner, Parametric analysis of polyhedral iteration spaces, Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, vol.19, pp.179-194, 1998.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00534840

J. Cohen and T. Hickey, Two algorithms for determining volumes of convex polyhedra, JACM, vol.26, pp.401-414, 1979.

D. Loera, J. A. Dutra, B. Koeppe, M. Moreinis, S. Pinto et al., Software for exact integration of polynomials over polytopes, Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, vol.46, pp.232-252, 2013.

D. Loera, J. A. Hemmecke, R. Tauzer, J. Yoshida, and R. , Effective Lattice Point Counting in Rational Convex Polytopes, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol.38, pp.1273-1302, 2004.

A. Barvinok, A polynomial time algorithm for counting integral points in polyhedra when the dimension is fixed, Mathematics of Operations Research, vol.19, pp.769-779, 1994.

F. Brandt, C. Geist, and M. Strobel, Analyzing the practical relevance of voting paradoxes via Ehrhart theory, computer simulations and empirical data, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2016.

F. Brandt, J. Hofbauer, and M. Strobel, Exploring the no-show paradox for Condorcet extensions using Ehrhart theory and computer simulations, 2019.

W. Bruns and B. Ichim, Polytope volumes by descent in the face lattice and applications in social choice, 2018.

W. Bruns, B. Ichim, and C. Söger, Computations of volumes and Ehrhart series in four candidate elections, Annals of Operations Research, pp.5-7, 2019.

W. Bruns and C. Söger, The computation of generalized Ehrhart series in Normaliz, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol.68, pp.75-86, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01022882

D. Bubboloni, M. Diss, and M. Gori, Extensions of the Simpson voting rule to committee selection setting, forthcoming in Public Choice, 2018.

D. Loera, J. A. Dutra, B. Koeppe, M. Moreinis, S. Pinto et al., Software for exact integration of polynomials over polytopes, Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, vol.46, pp.232-252, 2013.

D. Loera, J. A. Hemmecke, R. Tauzer, J. Yoshida, and R. , Effective Lattice Point Counting in Rational Convex Polytopes, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol.38, pp.1273-1302, 2004.

M. Diss and A. Doghmi, Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes, Public Choice, vol.169, pp.97-116, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01285526

M. Diss, E. Kamwa, and A. Tlidi, A note on the likelihood of the absolute majority paradoxes, Economic Bulletin, vol.38, pp.1727-1734, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01896273

M. Diss, E. Kamwa, and A. Tlidi, On some k-scoring rules for committees elections: agreement and Condorcet principle, 2019.

M. Diss and M. Mahajne, Social acceptability of Condorcet committees, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02003292

E. Ehrhart, Sur les polyèdres rationnels homothétiques à n dimensions, vol.254, pp.616-618, 1962.

W. V. Gehrlein, Condorcet winners on four candidates with anonymous voters, Economics Letters, vol.71, pp.335-340, 2001.

W. V. Gehrlein, Obtaining representations for probabilities of voting outcomes with effectively unlimited precision integer arithmetic, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.19, pp.503-512, 2002.

W. V. Gehrlein, Condorcet's paradox, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01452557

G. Wv and P. Fishburn, The probability of the paradox of voting: a computable solution, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.13, pp.14-25, 1976.

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Voting paradoxes and group coherence, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243452

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Elections, voting rules and paradoxical outcomes, 2017.

W. V. Gehrlein, D. Lepelley, and F. Plassmann, An Evaluation of the Benefit of Using Two-Stage Election Procedures, Homo Oeconomicus, vol.35, pp.53-79, 2018.

H. Huang and V. Chua, Analytical representation of probabilities under the IAC condition, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.17, pp.143-155, 2000.

D. Lepelley, Contribution à l'analyse des procédures de décision collective, unpublished dissertation, 1989.

D. Lepelley, A. Louichi, and H. Smaoui, On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.30, pp.363-383, 2008.

D. Lepelley and B. Mbih, The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule, Economics Letters, vol.24, pp.311-315, 1987.

H. Moulin, Axioms of cooperative decision making, 1988.

A. Schürmann, Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.40, pp.1097-1110, 2013.

S. Verdoolaege and M. Bruynooghe, Algorithms for Weighted Counting over Parametric Polytopes: A Survey and a Practical Comparison, Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Theory and Statistical Learning (ITSL), 2008.

W. Mc and G. Pritchard, Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.54, pp.244-256, 2007.

. A. Latte-integrale-by-de-loeraj, R. Hemmecke, J. Tauzer, R. Yoshida, and M. Köppe, , 2016.

W. Bruns, B. Ichim, and C. Söger, , vol.2, 2018.

J. C. Alcantud and A. Laruelle, Dis&approval voting: a characterization, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.43, pp.1-10, 2014.

A. Baujard and H. Igersheim, Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats, Revue Économique 60, pp.189-202, 2009.

A. Baujard, F. Gavrel, H. Igersheim, J. Laslier, and I. Lebon, Vote par approbation, vote par note : Une expérimentation lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril, Revue Économique, vol.64, issue.2, pp.345-356, 2012.

A. Baujard, H. Igersheim, I. Lebon, F. Gavrel, and J. F. Laslier, Who is favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election, Electoral Studies, vol.34, pp.131-145, 2014.

M. Beck and S. Robins, Computing the Continuous Discretely: Integer-point Enumeration in Polyhedra, 2015.

D. Black, Partial justification of the Borda count, Public Choice, vol.28, pp.1-15, 1976.

S. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Approval Voting, 1983.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047

F. Brandt, C. Geist, and M. Strobel, Analyzing the Practical Relevance of Voting Paradoxes via Ehrhart Theory, Computer Simulations, and Empirical Data, Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, pp.385-393, 2016.

W. Bruns and C. Söger, The computation of generalized Ehrhart series in Normaliz, Journal of Symbolic Computation, vol.68, pp.75-86, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01022882

M. Condorcet and . De, A survey of the principles underlying the Draft Constitution presented to the National Convention on 15 th and 16 th February 1793, The political theory of Condorcet, pp.216-222, 1793.

M. Diss, V. Merlin, and F. Valognes, On the Condorcet Efficiency of Approval Voting and extended scoring rules for three alternatives, in Handbook of Approval Voting, 2010.

D. S. Felsenthal, On combining approval with disapproval voting, Behavioral Science, vol.34, pp.53-60, 1989.

D. S. Felsenthal, Review of paradoxes afflicting procedures for electing a single candidate, Electoral Systems, 2012.

P. C. Fishburn and W. V. Gehrlein, Borda's rule, positional voting and Condorcet's simple majority principle, Public Choice, vol.28, pp.79-88, 1976.

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243452

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, The Condorcet Efficiency advantage that voter indifference gives to Approval Voting over some other Voting Rules, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol.24, issue.2, pp.243-269, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01450834

C. Hillinger, On the possibility of democracy and rational collective choice, 2004.

C. Hillinger, The case for utilitarian voting, Homo Oeconomicus, vol.23, pp.295-321, 2005.

H. Igersheim, A. Baujard, I. Lebon, J. Laslier, and F. Gravel, Individual behavior under evaluative voting: a comparison between laboratory and in situ experiment, Experimental Political Science, 2015.

I. Lebon, A. Baujard, F. Gavrel, H. Igersheim, and J. Laslier, How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting? Mimeo GATE L-SE, 2014.

D. Lepelley, Une caractérisation du vote à la majorité simple, RAIRO Operations Research, vol.26, pp.361-365, 1992.

D. Lepelley, A. Louichi, and H. Smaoui, On Ehrhart's polynomials and probability calculations in Voting Theory, Social Choice and Welfare 30, pp.363-383, 2008.

A. Macé, Voting with evaluations: When should we sum? What should we sum? Unpublished manuscript, 2015.

M. Pivato, Formal utilitarianism and range voting, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.67, pp.50-56, 2014.

A. Schürmann, Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.40, issue.4, pp.1097-1110, 2013.

H. Smaoui and D. Lepelley, Le système de vote par note à trois niveaux : étude d'un nouveau mode de scrutin, Revue d'Economie Politique, vol.6, pp.827-850, 2013.

M. C. Wilson and G. Pritchard, Probability Calculations under the IAC Hypothesis, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.54, pp.244-256, 2007.

J. A. Latte-integrale-by, M. Deloera, and . Köppe, , 2011.

. David-avis, , vol.6, 2011.

F. Aleskerov, D. Karabekyan, and R. Sanver, On the manipulability of voting rules: The case of 4 and 5 alternatives, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.64, pp.67-73, 2011.

M. Beck, D. Loera, J. Develin, M. , P. J. Stanley et al., Coefficients and roots of Ehrhart polynomials, vol.374, pp.15-36, 2005.

J. R. Chamberlin, An investigation into the relative manipulability of four voting systems, Behavioral Sciences, vol.30, pp.195-203, 1985.

E. Ehrhart, Sur les polyèdres rationnels homothétiques à n dimensions, vol.254, pp.616-618, 1962.

A. El-ouafdi, D. Lepelley, and H. Smaoui, On the Condorcet Efficiency of Evaluative Voting (and other Voting Rules) with Trichotomous Preferences, 2017.

A. El-ouafdi, D. Lepelley, and H. Smaoui, Probabilities of electoral outcomes: from threecandidate to four-candidate elections, Theory and Decision, 2019.

P. Favardin and D. Lepelley, Some further results on the manipulability of social choice's rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.26, pp.485-509, 2006.

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Elections, voting rules and paradoxical outcomes, 2017.

A. Gibbard, Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result, Econometrica, vol.41, pp.587-601, 1973.

J. S. Kelly, Almost all social choice rules are highly manipulable, but a few aren't, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.10, pp.161-175, 1993.

K. H. Kim and F. W. Roush, Statistical manipulability of social choice functions, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol.5, pp.263-282, 1996.

D. Lepelley and B. Mbih, The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule, Economics Letters, vol.24, pp.311-315, 1987.

D. Lepelley and B. Mbih, The Vulnerability of Four Social Choice Functions to Coalitional Manipulation of Preferences, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.11, pp.253-265, 1994.

D. Lepelley and F. Valognes, Voting rules, manipulability and social homogeneity, Public Choice, vol.116, pp.165-184, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00069239

S. Nitzan, The vulnerability of point-voting schemes to preference variation and strategic manipulation, Public Choice, vol.47, pp.349-370, 1985.

B. Peleg, A note on manipulability of large voting schemes, Theory and Decision, vol.11, pp.401-412, 1979.

G. Pritchard and M. Wilson, Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.29, pp.487-513, 2007.

D. G. Saari, Susceptibility to manipulation, Public Choice, vol.64, pp.21-41, 1990.

M. A. Satterthwaite, Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions, Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.10, pp.187-217, 1975.

H. Smaoui and D. Lepelley, Le système de vote par note à trois niveaux : étude d'un nouveau mode de scrutin, Revue d'Economie Politique, vol.123, pp.827-850, 2013.

J. A. Latte-integrale-by-de-loera, R. Hemmecke, J. Tauzer, R. Yoshida, and M. Köppe, , 2016.

, Annexe, vol.6, p.1266078804078890866515790897136634294313536303662454084800808111665596, 2016.

. Pr,