HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

“On the (Ab)use of Omega ?”

Abstract : Several recent finance articles use the Omega measure (Keating and Shadwick, 2002), defined as a ratio of potential gains out of possible losses, for gauging the performance of funds or active strategies, in substitution of the traditional Sharpe ratio, with the arguments that return distributions are not Gaussian and volatility is not always the relevant risk metric. Other authors also use Omega for optimizing (non-linear) portfolios with important downside risk. However, we question in this article the relevance of such approaches. First, we show through a basic illustration that the Omega ratio is inconsistent with the Second-order Stochastic Dominance criterion. Furthermore, we observe that the trade-off between return and risk corresponding to the Omega measure, may be essentially influenced by the mean return. Next, we illustrate in static and dynamic frameworks that Omega-based optimal portfolios can be closely associated with classical optimization paradigms depending on the chosen threshold used in Omega. Finally, we present robustness checks on long-only asset and hedge fund databases, that confirm our results.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Réunion Univ Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, January 31, 2022 - 1:57:54 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, March 31, 2022 - 5:58:02 PM

Links full text




Massimiliano Caporin, Michele Costola, Gregory Jannin, Bertrand Maillet. “On the (Ab)use of Omega ?”. Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, 2018, 46, pp.11-33. ⟨10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.11.007⟩. ⟨hal-03549448⟩



Record views